A solitaire engagement ring narrows things down fast: one stone, one setting, nothing competing with the diamond. Which means the cut, the prong count, and the metal are the three decisions you actually need to make before anything else. Round brilliant is the default for a reason, but it’s not the only option that works.
Whether you’re leaning toward a classic round, a more elongated oval, the sharp geometry of a princess cut, or the dramatic facets of a radiant, we’ve pulled real solitaires from real L&L weddings to show you each style in actual use. Click through any link to see the full wedding. For even more inspiration, browse our Real Weddings directory.
Our Favorite Solitaire Engagement Rings
First up: solitaire engagement rings spotted on real L&L weddings. Click any link to see the full day. Scroll further for shoppable options.
Four-Prong Round Brilliant Solitaire

A round brilliant in a four-prong platinum setting with a plain band, photographed on wood with Sarah’s diamond eternity band and Rich’s men’s band alongside it. Nothing competing with the stone here. The four-prong setting leaves more of the diamond’s girdle exposed than a six-prong, and the plain shank means all the visual weight sits on the center stone, exactly where it should.
See Sarah and Rich’s Maine Island Wedding →
Radiant-Cut Solitaire in Yellow Gold

The radiant cut is what you get when a princess cut and a round brilliant cross-breed: a rectangular body with cut corners, and a facet pattern that produces serious sparkle. Elizabeth’s ring shows it in yellow gold, which pairs well with the cut’s slightly warmer diamond since the warm metal echoes rather than fights it. Stacked here with a diamond eternity band and Ken’s band, but the center stone is unmistakable.
See Elizabeth and Ken’s Vail Wedding →
Six-Prong Round Brilliant Solitaire

The six-prong Tiffany-style setting has been the reference point for round brilliant solitaires for over a century, and this shot shows you exactly why it holds up. The prongs hold the diamond high and let light in from underneath, which is a large part of why the stone sparkles the way it does. Photographed on wood with a diamond eternity band alongside it, the round brilliant’s symmetry is clear from above: six evenly spaced prongs, a perfectly round stone, no ambiguity.
See Alicia’s New Hampshire Backyard Wedding →
Round Brilliant in a Blush Velvet Ring Box

Alicia’s round brilliant sits in a blush hexagonal velvet box surrounded by white and blush garden roses. The stone is set in a thin platinum prong setting, and the blush velvet does it no disservice. This is also a good reference for anyone trying to visualize what a classic round brilliant looks like from directly above: the facet pattern, the crown proportion, the way the stone fills the box without overwhelming it.
See Alicia and Gary’s California Country Club Wedding →
Round Brilliant on a Fuchsia Peony

White diamond against deep fuchsia peony: the contrast makes the stone look impossibly bright. Maggie’s round brilliant sits in a warm gold setting with a matching eternity band, both resting on a peony from her bouquet. Vivid backdrops like this are a photographer’s shortcut for making a colorless stone read with full presence in a photo, and it works.
See Maggie and Sam’s Memphis Wedding →
Rose Gold Round Brilliant Solitaire

Rose gold brings warmth to a round brilliant without the formality of yellow gold. Kelsey’s solitaire is set in a slim rose gold band, photographed close against Matt’s dark jacket, which gives the ring a clean contrasting background. The prong setting is simple and the stone sits at a comfortable height. If you’re going back and forth on metal color, this is the reference for how rose gold’s specific warmth reads against skin in natural light.
See Kelsey and Matt’s Bay Area Farm Wedding →
Round Brilliant Solitaire on Pink Hydrangeas

Michelle’s round brilliant sits in coral and pink hydrangea petals alongside her wedding stack. The soft flower petals diffuse the background entirely, so the diamond reads sharply against an all-organic backdrop. This kind of shot shows how a round brilliant still commands the frame even when it’s not on a neutral surface — the stone’s facets hold up against color.
See Michelle and Patrick’s Portsmouth Wedding →
Round Brilliant Solitaire in a Cream Velvet Box

From a Maine harvest styled shoot: a cream velvet ring box, a round brilliant in a thin rose gold setting, and fresh blueberries scattered on a stone surface with clean invitation stationery behind it. The square box keeps the focus entirely on the ring. A good reference for what a delicate rose gold solitaire looks like when photographed with intention rather than impulse.
See this Maine Harvest Styled Shoot →
Round Brilliant Solitaire on a Blush Peony

Maggie’s round brilliant in a thin silver setting rests on a blush peony from her bouquet, with coral and yellow roses at the edges. The ring is simple and the stone is the point: the pale pink petal makes a soft neutral backdrop that still has more visual interest than a tabletop. A good example of how a classic solitaire holds its own in a bright, colorful setting.
See Maggie and Mark’s Wedgewood Wedding →
Round Brilliant Solitaire with a Plain Gold Band

Becca’s round brilliant solitaire in a warm gold setting rests on a cluster of soft pink roses alongside Sean’s plain gold band. The two-ring pairing shows the engagement ring without the visual competition of a full wedding stack. The warm metal and the soft roses read as cohesive without being matchy, and the center stone still holds its own as the focal point.
See Becca and Sean’s Virginia Wedding →
Oval-Cut Solitaire in Rose Gold

Mindi’s oval-cut solitaire sits in a delicate rose gold band, stacked with a rose gold eternity band and additional bands in this portrait shot. The oval cut’s elongated shape is clear from this angle: noticeably longer than a round stone of the same carat weight, and that length covers more finger surface, which is why oval solitaires tend to read as larger than they actually are. The rose gold softens the look without making it fussy.
See Mindi and Jay’s Colorado Mountain Wedding →
Princess-Cut Solitaire in White Gold

The princess cut is square with sharp corners and a facet pattern that produces strong light return for a fancy shape. Amy’s ring sits in a clean white gold four-prong setting, photographed in a flat-lay on a printed wedding invitation with a rose blossom and eucalyptus leaf alongside the full ring stack. The square geometry of the princess cut is clearest when photographed from directly above, which this shot delivers.
See Amy and Charlie’s Arizona Wedding →
Round Brilliant in a Ring-Within-Ring Portrait

The ring-within-ring portrait shot frames the engagement ring inside the groom’s wider band, with rose gold eternity bands visible in the background. The composition draws the eye directly to the center stone. This framing technique is popular for a reason: placing a smaller ring inside a larger one creates natural, immediate focus. The round brilliant reads clearly from this overhead angle.
See this Austin Spring Wedding →
Round Brilliant Solitaire in a Stacked Ring Portrait

Lydia’s round brilliant solitaire is centered in a stacked ring portrait, the wedding bands arranged around it to frame the composition. The center stone sits in a delicate setting, and from this angle the round brilliant’s symmetry reads cleanly without distraction. Stacked portraits like this are useful for showing how the engagement ring relates visually to the rest of the set.
See Lydia and Josh’s Mountain Wedding →
FAQs
What’s the difference between a four-prong and six-prong solitaire setting?
Prong count changes how the diamond sits and how much of it is visible. A four-prong setting exposes more of the diamond’s girdle and gives a round brilliant a very slightly squarer look from above. A six-prong setting (the classic Tiffany style) holds the stone a bit higher, protects it from more angles, and gives the round brilliant that clean circular crown appearance most people picture when they think “solitaire.” Four prongs: more diamond showing. Six prongs: more classic silhouette. Neither is objectively better; it’s a visual preference.
What’s the most popular solitaire engagement ring cut?
Round brilliant, by a wide margin. It’s been the standard for over a century because the cut was designed specifically to maximize light return, meaning it out-sparkles virtually every other shape in most lighting conditions. Oval is the most popular alternative for people who want something slightly less expected. Princess and radiant cuts appeal to buyers who want sharper, more geometric lines.
Does a solitaire engagement ring stack well with a wedding band?
Yes, and a solitaire paired with a diamond eternity band is one of the most classic ring stacks there is. The plain solitaire lets the eternity band add texture without the two competing. The one thing to confirm before buying both: whether your solitaire’s setting allows a band to sit flush against it. Some cathedral or high-set solitaires need a contoured wedding band to nest properly. Ask your jeweler before committing to both pieces separately.
Is a solitaire engagement ring still in style?
It never went out of style. The solitaire is the reference point that every other engagement ring style gets measured against. Halo settings, three-stone rings, and cluster designs all have their moments, but none of them have displaced the solitaire as the default choice for couples who want the diamond to do all the work. It’s also the style most likely to look right in 30 years without feeling like a specific era.
What metal works best with a solitaire diamond?
Platinum and white gold make a colorless diamond appear brighter because the cool metal doesn’t add competing warmth. Yellow gold is the traditional choice and pairs especially well with radiant, cushion, or oval cuts, where the warm metal echoes the stone’s slightly warmer character. Rose gold has been a consistent choice for over a decade and pairs well with both round and oval cuts. All three are genuinely good options. The choice usually comes down to skin tone and personal preference more than anything else.
